On Nov. 15, 2022, a publish was created on the discussion board web site bitcointalk.org and the thread’s creator requested folks to share signatures tied to a few of their oldest mined bitcoin blocks. 11 days later, a newly created bitcointalk.org profile, referred to as “Onesignature,” shared a signed message tethered to an especially outdated block reward created on Jan. 19, 2009. The important thing was related to bitcoin block 1,018 which was created 16 days after Satoshi Nakamoto launched the community.
Mysterious Particular person Indicators a Message Tied to a Block Reward Created on January 19, 2009
An unknown bitcointalk.org consumer referred to as “Onesignature,” signed a message tied to bitcoin block 1,018, an especially outdated bitcoin block reward that was created on Jan. 19, 2009. The block signing was found by the proprietor of bitcoin.org, the pseudonymous character referred to as “Cobra.” “A consumer ‘Onesignature’ has appeared and posted the signature for a key related to block #1,018,” Cobra tweeted. “For context, there are most likely a handful of individuals on the planet who can signal with a Jan. 2009 key,” Cobra added.
The bitcointalk.org publish reveals the consumer Onesignature’s shared signed message was a bitcoin handle that was first seen on Dec. 2, 2022. The BTC handle “1E9Yw” has seen just a few mud transactions despatched to the pockets because the day it was first seen. The signature (HCsBcgB+Wcm8kOGMH8IpNeg0H4gjCrlqwDf/GlSXphZGBYxm0QkKEPhh9DTJRp2IDNUhVr0FhP9qCqo2W0recNM=) is related to the bitcoin handle “1NChf.” The handle held the block reward (1,018) within the pockets up till June 14, 2011.
Moreover, one consumer found that the mined cash, transferred in 2011, additionally had “personal keys of addresses that mined sooner than the above-mentioned handle.” The folks within the publish puzzled if the consumer Onesignature was really Satoshi Nakamoto, however Cobra detailed on Twitter that the handle was not a “Patoshi block,” a block related to Bitcoin’s creator, and remarked that it was “unlikely to be Satoshi.”
“Whereas many individuals *might* have mined Bitcoin that early, the overwhelming proof suggests that hardly anyone did,” Cobra added. “Bitcoin was obscure, irrelevant, and seen as a dumb thought, why set up some random .exe?” In Cobra’s Twitter thread, the pseudonymous whistleblower referred to as “Fatman” stated the outdated handle might have been bought from somebody later in time. Fatman shared an outdated bitcointalk.org screenshot that reveals somebody noting that “many elderly keys have been bought or leaked.”
Moreover, it was additionally found {that a} Twitter account exists and it makes use of the title “@onesignature.” The Twitter account, additionally named “Andy,” was coincidentally created in October 2009 and the account’s profile picture says “don’t belief anybody.”
Within the bitcointalk.org thread, a consumer additionally famous that the signed handle was related to a lot of block rewards talked about and photographed in a Forbes article written by Andy Greenberg. The article is about one among Bitcoin’s earliest adopters, Hal Finney. Bitcointalk.org members additionally speculated that the handle was in some way related to the now-deceased Bitcoin developer.
Replying to Fatman on Friday, Cobra stated that if Onesignature did “buy a Jan 2009 key, they’re about to get swamped with huge affords.” “Somebody is making an attempt to make a daring assertion,” Cobra added.
What do you consider Onesignature signing an historical bitcoin block from 2009? Tell us what you consider this topic within the feedback part beneath.
Picture Credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
Disclaimer: This text is for informational functions solely. It’s not a direct supply or solicitation of a suggestion to purchase or promote, or a advice or endorsement of any merchandise, companies, or corporations. Bitcoin.com doesn’t present funding, tax, authorized, or accounting recommendation. Neither the corporate nor the creator is accountable, instantly or not directly, for any harm or loss induced or alleged to be brought on by or in reference to the usage of or reliance on any content material, items or companies talked about on this article.
