Through the week of Jan. 30 to Feb. 5, 2022, the search time period “NFT” had a Google Traits (GT) rating of 90 and right now the GT rating has dropped an ideal deal right down to a rating of 12. Not solely has curiosity declined, however blue chip non-fungible tokens (NFTs) don’t maintain the worth they as soon as did firstly of 2022. As an example, statistics present the Bored Ape Yacht Membership (BAYC) assortment’s market valuation based mostly on flooring values was value $2.33 billion on Feb. 3, 2022 — 291 days later and the gathering’s market cap is now value $615 million. Celebrities holding blue chip NFTs like BAYCs and Cryptopunks have seen their NFTs lose quite a lot of worth over the past 9 months.
Blue Chip NFT Market Caps Slide Considerably Decrease For the reason that Begin of the Yr
Widespread non-fungible tokens (NFTs) stemming from particular collections like BAYC, Cryptopunks, Clonex, Mutant Ape Yacht Membership (MAYC), Azuki, and Moonbirds are nonetheless dear digital collectibles. As an example, the bottom valued Moonbird NFT is round 7 ether or $7,906, whereas a BAYC NFT will value 57.50 ether or $63K.

Statistics from nftpricefloor.com present that on Nov. 22, 2022, the Cryptopunks assortment held the most important market capitalization of round 619,900 ether. That’s not a lot lower than the Cryptopunks flooring capitalization the gathering had on Feb. 3, 2022, when it was 650,000 ETH.
Nevertheless, the worth of ethereum per unit on Feb. 3 was roughly 2,667 nominal U.S. {dollars} per ether. Which means whereas the ground capitalization was value $1.73 billion 9 months in the past, right now the market cap is right down to $685.16 million.
This implies the Cryptopunks NFT assortment dropped by 60.47% over the last 9 months. The identical might be mentioned about BAYC’s NFTs because the market cap has dropped from 875,000 ether value $2.33 billion on Feb. 3, to right now’s 556,900 ETH value $615.53 million.
NFTs Owned by the Wealthy and Well-known Misplaced Large Quantities of Worth in 9 Months
The info reveals over the last 9 months, BAYC’s assortment dropped by 73.62% towards the U.S. greenback. On Jan. 2, 2022, the rap star Eminem bought BAYC #9055 for 123.45 ether and on the time, it was value roughly $452K.
Eminem moved his BAYC from the “Shady_Holdings” account he makes use of on Opensea to the tackle “0x79f.” Dappradar.com estimates present Eminem’s BAYC is barely value 57.96 ETH right now or $63,934.
Eminem’s NFT at that estimated worth means BAYC #9055 misplaced 85.85% in worth since he first purchased the NFT. Pop star Justin Bieber acquired Bored Ape #3001 for 500 ETH which was value $1.3 million on the time. As we speak, Bieber’s BAYC NFT is value lower than 60 ETH or roughly $69K.
Socialite Paris Hilton leveraged the corporate Moonpay to purchase Bored Ape #1294 for 119 ether or $317K. On the finish of November 2022, Hilton’s BAYC #1294 is barely value $63,783 in accordance with present estimates.
The identical might be mentioned for a myriad of celebrities that personal BAYCs or Cryptopunks NFTs, together with house owners like Shaquille O’Neal, Jimmy Fallon, and Gwyneth Paltrow. It’s secure to say that NFTs have misplaced much more worth than the nice artwork a few of these celebrities personal, as nice artwork costs haven’t seen values fall by 60% to 80% in 9 months’ time.
What do you concentrate on the decline in blue chip NFT values because the begin of the 12 months? What do you concentrate on the NFTs owned by celebrities dropping important worth since they had been bought? Tell us what you concentrate on this topic within the feedback part beneath.
Picture Credit: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons
Disclaimer: This text is for informational functions solely. It isn’t a direct provide or solicitation of a proposal to purchase or promote, or a advice or endorsement of any merchandise, companies, or firms. Bitcoin.com doesn’t present funding, tax, authorized, or accounting recommendation. Neither the corporate nor the creator is accountable, straight or not directly, for any harm or loss precipitated or alleged to be attributable to or in reference to the usage of or reliance on any content material, items or companies talked about on this article.